🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.